Idaho
Midwifery
Council
 
Home

IMC Bylaws

IMC Board Members

Midwifery Review Board

Guidelines of Practice

What is Midwifery Care?

BMJ:  Safety in Home Birth

Topics of Interest

Find an Idaho Midwife

Midwives' Day

Legislative Updates

IMC Newsletter

Join IMC

Upcoming Events

Contact Us

Links

 

Copyright 2005-2007
Idaho Midwifery Council
All rights reserved

Legislative Update

        Currently, the State of Idaho offers no certification process or licensure for direct entry midwives.  However, midwives are recognized in the Idaho code:  they are instructed to test for syphilis prenatally, to instill eye ointment in the newborn's eyes, to perform newborn screening, and to file birth certificates in a timely manner. 

          Because of this unlicensed and unregulated situation, many Idaho midwives have opted to acquire voluntary certification through the North American Registry of Midwives.  NARM verifies the education and skills of applicants and grants the status of Certified Professional Midwife to those who satisfactorily complete the process.  However, the CPM credential does not protect midwives practicing in Idaho from the potential of prosecution for the "practice of medicine" if they choose to use drugs, perform an episiotomy, or suture an episiotomy or a tear.

          Legislation is a multi-faceted issue.  A midwifery law has been proposed a number of times in recent years, but to date has never made it through the writing process, into committee, and out onto the Idaho Senate and House floors for a vote. 

           IMC has a legislative committee which is actively involved in writing and rewriting a midwifery voluntary licensure bill, working with the Idaho Perinatal Project addressing their concerns, educating the public regarding the benefits of midwifery care and many other tasks.  It is our responsibility as midwives, friends of midwifery, and responsible consumers of midwifery to stay abreast of any developments in this area. Please check back often.
 

Legislative Report   Spring 2008

Following our legislative efforts last year, Senate Bill 1145 which proposed voluntary licensure for the CPM, was reworked and rewritten by IMC's legislative committee in cooperation with the Idaho Perinatal Project and others with an interest.  Idahoans for Midwives also worked very hard getting the word out to midwifery consumers and expanding support for midwifery and midwives.  

Early in the 2008 legislative session, the bill was reintroduced as House Bill 488, The Idaho Midwifery Voluntary Licensing Act.  Barb Rawlings, Michelle Bartlett and Kyndal May met with House sponsor Reps. Janice McGeachin and Jo An Wood and original Senate sponsors of the 2007 bill to prepare for the hearing before the House Health and Welfare Committee.  Many midwives and midwifery supporters called, emailed and wrote letters explaining why this bill is needed and urging legislators to support the bill.  Families visited legislators in person.  Not surprisingly, the Idaho Medical Association lobbied against the bill, citing many reasons, notably the voluntary aspect. 

Impassioned testimony, presided over by Rep. Sharon Block, was presented to the House Health and Welfare Committee over two days by supporters and detractors.  After a further day of discussion, amendments were added and the bill was passed out of committee 9-3 with the voluntary nature of the bill intact.

HB 488 was read on the House floor and as expected, Representatives opposed to the bill presented amendments against it, all of which were voted down.  The bill was read twice more before the House and was set for debate and a vote.  When it appeared that passage was likely, the bill was referred to the Idaho Attorney General for his opinion on some ambiguous language.  After discussion with attorneys, HB488aa was pulled from the House calendar until the problem can be corrected. 

Although disappointing at the end, the wild ride of 2008 was successful in many ways.  Many thanks go to our great sponsors and co-sponsors both in the House and Senate, as well as other legislators who were so supportive.  In addition, a great debt is owed to Barb, Michelle and Kyndal who gave so much time and effort, and also to the many supporters of midwifery in Idaho.  Your voices were heard!

Take a deep breath, for 2009 is ahead and with it come new legislative challenges.  Idahoans for Midwives is in need of volunteer help; please contact contact Caralee Anderton at 542-1199 if you can help.  IFM valiantly supported us in the legislative process.



Note from Michelle Bartlett     April 2008

Dear Friends,

I have been lurking for a few days. I think communication is always a good idea. I would like to respond to a few of the issues raised.

In 2001, I was arrested at my home, in front of my 6 children, and on a holiday weekend. The arrest warrant was in the form of a $5000.00 cash only bond. Needless to say, I spent almost 24 hours in jail and had a very sleepless overnight stay in a pod of about 20 other women. The whole exerience still brings up very very strong emotions. It actually took my several years before I could even talk about my exerience.

No one can imagine the amount of stress and trauma that a family  goes through when a prosecution happens. I did, in fact, quit practicing midwifery at one point. It cost $10,0000 in attorney's fees to have the case dismissed. Friends, church members, and having fundraisers did help with $3000.00 of the expenses. But in reality, the financial impact was the least of the stresses associated with midwifery prosecution.

Midwifery prosecution is on the rise in the US. A midwife in WY. was just prosecuted. I could go on and on with a list of midwives that have gone through prosecution. Prosecution can ruin a midwives complete livelihood, not to mention the toll on the birthing community.

When pregnant couples come to me for an interview for services, many times one of the questions they ask is 'Do you have pitocin to stop a hemorrhage?' And, I don't blame them. It is what I asked my own midwives. Hemorrhage can happen unexpectantly. Herbs work most of the time but not all of the time. Some women are allergic to herbs. But the point is, that it is absolutely not fair to midwives or their families, for couples to ask them to be ready to use an antihemorrhagic or oxygen, thereby committing a felony and not step up to the plate and help us pass a 'Voluntary' law to give them the ability to legally practice within their training and skill level if they so choose.

If a midwife does not want to be licensed, great, don't get a license. And, why does anyone think that by creating licensure it makes things worse for those that choose not to? In the bill's language, we made the practice of midwifery expressly legal and NOT the practice of medicine, nursing or nurse-midwifery. The practice of midwifery without a license would be reduced to a misdemeanor instead of a felony, which, I can tell you in this state is a $10,000.00 fine and/or up to 5 years in prison.

Also, if you think that things in the world of midwives is going to stay the same you should investigate the AMA's Scope of Practice Partnership resolution. Many states are starting to see the state medical associations trying to quietly sneak in changes to their medical practice act. Because of the huge expansion of midlevel providers the AMA is trying restriction of the expansion of mid-level providers by expanding the definition of what constitutes the practice of medicine. Midwives, Nurse-Anesthetists, Chiropractors, Nurse-midwives, nurse-practitioners, podiatrists, and optometrists are all targets of SOPP. And, as I mentioned before, prosecutions are on the increase.

We all, as citizens of this country, have a civil responsibility to protect our choices and freedoms. Homebirth, homeschooling, freedom to reject mandatory vaccinations and many of our other freedoms cannot be taken for granted. Birth in this country is a mess. The cesarean section rate in this country is a tragedy and an atrocity against women. How are we going to change birth for our sisters and children? Birth change cannot happen is we sit on our hands. I see a day when midwifery is legally recognized in all 50 states, technologic birth is exposed for the harm it is doing to mothers and babies, and midwifery care is commonplace. I think the winds of change are blowing. We now have some very proactive midwifery organizations nationwide: The Birth Policy Coalition, The Midwives Alliance of North America, Citizens for Midwifery, The North American Registry of Midwives, The Foundation for the Advancement of Midwifery, the Midwives Education Accreditation Council, The White Ribbon Alliance, the National Association of Certified Professional Midwives. And, the list could go on. Ricki Lake's new documentary is out and creating awareness.

Lastly, there are many states that have good midwifery licensure programs. Wisconsin has the latest and it is working really well. Katie Prown, I am sure would be willing to talk to you about that.

As for losing freedoms, I think we can craft great legislation and elect officials that really care about protecting our freedoms. It is an election year. We have to go to the polls. We have to do our part. Idahoans for Midwives and the IMC have just sent out a candidate survey to all the candidates statewide that are running in a primary. We will post the results as soon as we have them. In the meantime, we should strongly consider supporting those legislators that were supportive of the voluntary licensure bill last year. I had the privilege of getting to know many of these people. They would really appreciate help with their election campaigns.

Sorry this is so long. We really do need help. And, if you can't help with your time, money is greatly appreciated. One of the goals of this group has always been to pass legislation in Idaho. Other goals include community awareness and education about all types of Midwifery Care.

I hope you all can come out to the Region 4 Idaho Midwives
Day Picnic May 3rd @ Tautphaus Park 11:30am.

Love, Michelle Bartlett


Previous legislative updates